Saturday, September 29, 2012

 

Jeremy Brett: The Quintessential Sherlock Holmes

















One of the greatest travesties in of ALL of film is that Jeremy
Brett who played the title role from 1984 through 1994 was ignored by
his peers. Shame on them, because although the series was a huge
critical success, he never received an award of any kind for his
outstanding portrayal. Amazingly, it seems that Granada Television
received no awards, nor anyone even remotely connected to this
outstanding series of mysteries. What seems to be the greatest mystery
of all is how on earth this finely tuned team was ignored. The sets were
ALWAYS painstakingly accurate, and certainly that was no small feat,
the cinematography excelled at creativity, and the costumes were
 inspired. This is not mention the screen writing that was minimal
(as most great screen writing should be) when in the hands of a
talented cast, directors and producers.



  Mr. Brett died in 1995 working on Sherlock Holmes until close to
the bitter end. He was admired and befriended by Sir Arthur Conan
Doyle's daughter Dame Jean Conan Doyle. The forty one episodes are all
delightful. All are available on DVD or online at Netflix. I saw the
series first on PBS and later on A & E. I was thrilled to see them all
again on Netflix and mind you, it did not bother me in the least. It
did remind me of just how wonderful Mr. Brett was as an actor. It
reminded me of that period of time in British Television when series
like Upstairs Downstairs, All Creatures Great and Small, Poirot (to
name a few) were not only highbrow, but actually taught us something
positive. These were family shows, there was never an abundance of
violence, they were elegant and taught us manners. One of my favorite
line's of Holmes is at the end of the video I'm sharing: when he SIC tells
 an adversary that " He should take off the cigar band from his cigar or 
people will assume he is a bounder". It is nuances like these that not 
only school us, but we remember.

  Some may want to challenge my "Colonial" views on this Blog
because I am in THIS instance, saluting The Raj, yet those would be
the lowbrows. Fortunately the highbrows have absorbed what they
choose to of Colonialism and spit the rest out. Perhaps it is because
my Dad was an architect that I enjoyed the Adventures of Sherlock
Holmes so much. When we look at all the manufactured crap that we are
producing in today's world and the decline and fall of artistic
masters of tradesmen be they working in iron, stone, fabric or woodwork
its little wonder I liked the sets. There are a few giants of film
that painstakingly reproduce a set the way it should be like David
Mamet, Robert Altman or Ashutosh Gowariker, but not many who don't cut
corners these days.

 I miss the lack of these type of family shows and to be honest I
miss Mr. Brett and his cerebral charm or maybe it was more of his
aloofness or dismissive nature. You can find Mr. Brett in a few other
notable films, but not many. He was in War and Peace with Audrey
Hepburn and again with her in My Fair Lady. I always thought he'd make
a great Jeeves as I have always found those who tried to be PG
Wodehouse's unique character Jeeves to be somewhat lacking.
 Unfortunately, we'll never know. It is ELEMENTARY that If any actor
deserves an award (of any kind) posthumously, it is Mr. Brett. Do hunt
for the series and you'll not be disappointed nor do you require to see
 the episodes in any particular order.








Here is a very worthwhile petition you can sign

www.bafta4jb.com/the-petition/petition-letter/

Labels: , , , ,


 

La Roca, Nogales, Sonora , Mexico




       You won't find the most famous restaurant south of Tucson at the elegant Tubac Resort and Spa, nor in sprawling Green Valley. The Cow Palace in Amado despite hosting John Wayne, Stewart Granger and other notable Hollywood cowboys is not the most famous either. One and only one restaurant has held the title for the the last forty years, and it is the spacious architectural gem located a mere block and a half inside the Mexican border simply called, La Roca. 


        The massive wrought iron gates, stone paved patio and colossal fountain greet us along with the bountiful greenery, abundant stylish outside furniture, fresh bright paint and generous second story windows. La Roca looks more like a stately mansion than a restaurant, however it is not stuffy in the least, it is vibrant, fun and alive with activity. It is a special place that mixes a bygone age of leisure with a contemporary zing that is unique. The many employees you'll notice all wear a smile with their clean pressed uniforms, in fact their pride is contagious, we the patrons are proud to be there. 


        Climbing the wide stairway to our destination we enter the main dining room to the warm greetings from Captains Enrique and Lupe to their handsome waiters in starched white jackets, black bow ties, and name tags (least we forget), even the uniformed busboys are welcoming. Now where to sit? Near the ample stage? The alcoves that are carved out of the mountain's stone? Near the roaring fireplace on a frosty night? Or perhaps the bright, comfy booths along the windows with splendid views of the gardens? Vases of fresh flowers, bright Mexican paintings, and artifacts mingle with the colorful cotton tablecloths and napkins that await our attentions. 

      
          This evening as its my guests first visit we choose to continue to the bar. El Balcon, La Roca's bar is past the ritzy bathrooms, spacious kitchen, and elegant meeting room that is inviting rather than sparse. More tables line more windows overlooking the massive fountain, another two smaller rooms with flat screens and Viola! we're in the bar. El Balcon as you might have guessed has a large balcony replete with tables and chairs looking out on the street, where I can grab a smoke. Inside we notice the polished copper bar and stools along with comfortable overstuffed leather chairs. Some choose to dine in El Balcon and do so on pounded silver Nambe trays, perhaps watching something on the massive flat screen. Tonight though, we sip our frozen margaritas and daiquiris Roberto so expertly concocted and flag down Lupe for our table. 


          We are seated as the mariachis softly play an old favorite from the stage, the glasses of purified water and colorful billboard style menu arrive with a smiling waiter. I explain to my guests that Sonora the Mexican state that we are in serves the finest beef in all of Mexico and it is the home of Guaymas on the Sea of Cortez where the huge and tasty jumbo prawns come from. I also share with them that the sea bass is outstanding. By the time we are finished we end up sharing a single flan with our Mexican coffee. For we three, the bill (including tip, and our drink in El Balcon) came to an even 100.00. Quite a bargain for the quality and quantity we devoured. However, you can take advantage of La Roca's buffet either for lunch or breakfast on the weekends and there you'll get the same outstanding service, and great food for under 10.00 for breakfast, and under 15.00 for lunch. 


         Now, when you mention Southern Arizona to your friends back home, and they say (as they always do) "Did you go to La Roca?" you can smile and say " Absolutely ! ". Reservations are encouraged. Call from your cell phone if you'd like an escort from the border. For hours, directions, telephone, menus, catering, special events and the world famous artisans store on premises called, El Changarro see: 
www.larocarestaurant.com

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


 

Women and Gays In IFA And Orisha Worship (A Revolution In Traditional African Religion And Diaspora)





327 pages 
Ana Maria was a was what I call a floater she was baptized Catholic and born in Lucumi, and eventually crowned. Being a Santera just did not seem enough for her and she began to  learn IFA. She was relentless in her studies, but had no interest in marrying a Babalawo because she was a lesbian. During her studies she cast aside Catholicism and took it out of her personal practices and worship. This was an improvement, but she still felt she was destined for higher service. Next she became a Palera, but never felt that IFA (her passion) and Palo walked hand in hand, as they seemed to in Orisha worship.  She tried Voodoo, Hoodoo, and other traditions, always coming back to IFA, despite what she felt was a suppression of equality for women and gays. 




After a time, she began reading how women were treated as equals in Yoruband, so she joined an ile in the state of Ogun and learned that in Yorubaland there were still things a man could do, that a woman could not in IFA. She asked many elders about this, who usually answered evasively, or asked her to consider why Olodumare made male and female. The wise Awo would entreaty that women have an equally important role in the religion as in day to day life, but there is a difference, just as a male can not birth a child, neither can a woman initiate the process without a man. She understood, but still she was unhappy and felt women were slighted from, not just IFA, but counsels, and the hierarchy. Ana Maria began to see that it was not just Lucumi where women were not equal, the more times she heard "equal, but different" the angrier and more frustrated she became.  She visited Brazil where woman have a rich history because the Portuguese had murdered all the male Babalawos centuries ago. The problem in Brazil was that she found Portuguese to be difficult to learn. She saw that while Orisha worship was perhaps even skewed to women in Brazil, IFA seemed to be newer there and more murky. 



327 paginas 

 
 


            Ana Maria met Jim in a forum on Facebook, Jim was gay and like Ana was a floater, they had traveled the same road for different reasons. He was well spoken, knowledgeable and an independent student of IFA. Jim like Ana was frustrated and unwilling to accept the tenants of IFA that preclude gay men from the priesthood. For my part, I met both Ana Maria on a Facebook, but separately, both had written me a nice note congratulating me on my book, Nature's Ancient Religion. Ana Maria had read my book in Spanish (IFA y los Orishas: La Religion Antigua de la Naturaleza), and Jim had read my book in English. Over time I began to see both Ana and Jim pop up on many groups on Facebook and forums elsewhere. In the course of things we three became Internet friends. Not being gay or a woman caused me to reflect on their plight, their gripes, and their feelings. You see it was not just Ana and Jim, it was a large group of women and gay men who were equally frustrated. 








             Like many Awo, I understood their frustration, yet I was and am in no position to change the way things are, and in fact I am not sure I would , if I could. In fact this irked and irks me to see the same exact discussions over and over, and in every single group I belong to. You see, while I am sympathetic to their plight, I am happy with my beloved Lucumi, there is no chance of changing the tradition as I see it.  However, I put on my thinking cap, because like a baby that is crying, crying and crying, the baby will not stop unless he or she is attended to. The baby may need changing, food, or simply attention. 


              We all learn from history, be it oral, written or experienced. It we look at our religion(s), we find they are fragmented with traditions, some of these fragmentation's in diaspora came about because of necessity rather than choice, yet other purely came from choice. Even in noble Yorubaland there are fragmentation's, Oyo does not do some things as Osogbo, just as Osogbo does not do all things as in Ife. These differences can be either in mechanics or philosophy (or both), the same is true when comparing other West African traditions to Yorubaland, There is often a misconception that all of Yorubaland does things the same, when the reality is quite different. There is a beauty to our structure, that not enough followers appreciate. Some of those seek misguidedly to combine all the traditions and make one super religion. This of course will never happen, as centuries of tradition and culture are not given up, ever. Many of these ONE Super religion types also tend to insinuate and in some cases outright claim that their tradition is superior in power, history, or culture to others. There are other motives like money, but let's avoid looking at these and focus just on those who seek to consolidate. We'll often find the consolidators the worst culprits in disrespecting other branches or traditions of our religion, why? Because they have a motive or motives. The enlightened, see the futility of promoting consolidation, and tend to be more receptive in respecting those traditions that are not their own, but related. If we look at my beloved Lucumi, we find that like in Yorubaland (or anywhere else) mechanics and philosophy vary somewhat ile to ile, and more so from rama to rama. Therefore, the reality is anywhere on the planet we look, we see differences. 


          These differences are to be respected, just as our many similarities are to be celebrated. Disrespecting another tradition, or ile is much like a divorced spouse ranting and raving about their former mate. It is unsightly, and we ask, " Humm, I wonder why she or he married them in the first place". It also can and often does damage the children born from this union.The wise former spouse, sings the praises of their former mate, and learns the lesson to not drink the same dirty water. If we look at other religion, (ANY other religion), we see differences that through history have cause fragmentation. Look at the Jews who spawned, both Christianity and Islam. Islam has Sunni and Shi'a, and other branches that fall from that tree. Christianity we can start with East vs Roman Catholic, continue to Martin Luther branching off, and all the branches of Protestantism. We can do this exercise in Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, etc, etc. Now coming full circle, we notice that while there are many branches, the trees they belong to are clearly defined, and not in dispute. The same is true with all the diaspora based traditions, they came from West Africa and are part of those various trees in that grove, 


            In conclusion, I must ask when will Ana and Jim and all the other gay and women who want to have a larger role in IFA begin to learn from history? Why have they not started their own tradition(s)? My ogbe sa brain tells me that at some point they will stop exhausting themselves swimming up stream in Oshun's river and just create their own tradition. When this happens, history will tell us there is much resistance and perhaps centuries before the rest of the groves accept them as family, yet like all religions this is the price of being a separatist.

About the author: 
www.amazon.com/Charles-Spencer-King/e/B002ELIWKI/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1

Facebook ~ add me
www.facebook.com/Orunmila

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


Thursday, September 27, 2012

 

9 -11, Andrew Marshall King And Sharia Law


AK

The last  twelve months have been perhaps the busiest for me since the 2002  anniversary of my brother Andrew Marshall King's murder in the North tower of the WTC. We've had the 10th anniversary, the ceremony in NYC, and of course the killing of Bin Laden. The requests for interviews and commentary has been in a word, overwhelming. Clearly, I get more than my fair share because I am a writer. I also write on religion, terrorism and global counter terrorism strategies. My quote" I am not anti Muslim, but I am anti Islam" gets quite a bit of play, and discussion. I also have a presence in India where sadly, more religious terrorism happens than anywhere. 


Memorial in NYC

         This year though you won't find my poignant quotes or commentary other than here. This year I am being selfish. My friends can't reach me because I hatched this plan about two months ago when my phone was stolen, I did not replace it. Sure you can still get me on the Internet, through umpteen sites via Google or any search engine, but I checked out of Facebook until the twelfth. I recently built a Facebook page for my brother that people can " LIKE", comment and look at some fun old photos. The many events from many own 9 -11 golf tournament in Havana, Cuba to the one at his home club in Princeton for kids are all doing well. The memorials from the garden at Elgin Academy to the garden at UNC Chapel Hill, are all looking good. The scholarships in his name to various educational institutions are all making a difference to our youth. The memorial bridge Dad and I built in Geneva, Illinois, is solid as the rocks that built it. The many other varied contributions in his name assure he is not forgotten.


AMK Memorial Bridge, Illinois


         The guilt I feel is not being available for his family and friends with a bear hug, as was his custom. Or my voice on the phone. This year has been a draining one for me, Dad is in the final stage of Alzheimer's and a handful. Sure I have care for him ( that's why we moved across the border to Mexico), but it is still a handful. I refuse to send him to a home though, where he'd be restricted, and mostly locked up, to await the inevitable.I'd rather not desert him, let him drink his beers, cokes, and eat foods he likes. He won't remember it is 9 -11, or that his prized son is dead, unless I remind him, and why be cruel? Misery does not love company in this case. I'll watch HBO and avoid the specials and news too, as will he. You see the promotion of each of these news items hurts anyone who suffered a loss, not just the day itself, but the lead up is cruel. Families don't need reminders, for us we remember every day, not just around 9 -11, or when we see an old film with the twin towers. Other terrorist activities, hurt us each and every time they occur, holidays crush us. 

Bronze Plaque, designed and donated by Todd Darrow & Family

           Bin Laden's death, may have helped some families, but for me it was disappointing. For a Muslim, death is a reward, so I always want an incarceration. This is one of the things wrong with Islam and part of why I say " I'm not anti Muslim, but I am anti Islam". Defenders can say, it is a poor interpretation or translation, but it is obvious too many Muslims believe this.The same is true of  the parts of the Qu'ran that wish to convert or expunge (kill) all non Muslims in holy lands, or the fundamentalist madrassas who teach children hate. These fundamentalists wish Sharia law, that keeps women restricted from education, targets for honor killings and public stoning. Governments need to start waking up to the fact that this is a threat to their sovereignty and democracies. Those Muslims who stay silent to the terrorist house down the block are guilty of being part of the problem, just as they are when they do not report a radical Imam or cleric, inciting, condoning, or applauding violence. 


Chapel Hill, UNC Memorial Garden

          We in the West, need to become better educated and know the difference of a Sikh and a Muslim. However, today's world is different, Sikhs need to be permitted by their own laws to take off their turbans, for inspections at an airport or other secure area. The Sikhs historically and geographically traditional foes of Muslims, not allies !  France has outlawed the burka and hijab, not because they hate Muslims but because they are security threats, I applaud them. Wear these at home, not on the street, again this is a threat to national securities and Islam is a threat to sovereignty. Those that seek to share the opinion that the West is stepping on the rights of Muslims, needs to face the facts that it is non Muslims rights for security, democracy and women's rights that Muslims are stepping on. There are many fine Muslims, that abhor violence, yet many other's sit on their hands, one is to be lauded, the other to be found guilty. Muslims need to realize that they came to the West to live and profit from our cultures, if they feel persecuted, they can and should leave.  The same is true in India, if they want to promote fundamentalism, go somewhere else, India is secular. 


9-11 Tournament prize, The AMK Trophy 

       The intolerance of some interpretations or translations of Islam is a germ that needs to be combated. It is a global problem that I compare to genocide, because in a nutshell, that is what radical, fundamentalist Islam wants, to convert or expunge us, that is the part of Sharia Law, many choose to sweep under the rug. This is as big of threat as Hitler was to the Jews, or The Spanish Inquisition was to a indigenous native or heretic. It is the moderate Muslims that seem to forget that another part of Sharia law applies to those Muslims not devout enough, they too are scheduled to be expunged. It is a shame because it was a branch of Islam that brought the West out of the Dark Ages, with their many advances and discoveries in medicine, science, math, philosophy, arts, agriculture, architecture, commerce, and astronomy.Unfortunately, that was centuries ago. Now they are the cause of most of the world's religious terrorism. Change all starts with education, the  madrassas must stop teaching non tolerance and promoting violence. Moderate Muslims need to stand up and be counted, lead with interpretations that promote tolerance and shun violence. Muslims need to stop enslaving and expunging traditional African, Asian and Islanders, and respect their native cultures.  


Me and my best friend

         Jai Hind, is Hindi for many things, the translation is usually A FREE INDIA, or something thereabouts depending on the context. It is a patriotic, beautiful phrase. It embodies all the history, culture, struggles, atrocities, suffered by all Indians on the way to freedom and democracy. My brother, would have liked this phrase and all it stands for. 

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


 

Sticks & Stones & Islam



Sharia, 

It is again for the umpteenth time I raise my trumpet to play a variation of the same old tune. When you're a religious author like me who has the rank of Baba Awo on par with a Catholic Arch Bishop, you're supposed to walk softly and criticize with velvet gloves,  rather than a sledgehammer. But my patience grows thinner and thinner each day. I am not a big fan of Israel, but their hardened red line stance is the wisest course of action. What the democracies of the West don't talk about openly is that Islam does not want to coexist in peace with any other religion. Some moderates of Islam continue to sell the tired overplayed song that Islam is a peaceful religion, but it is not. 



       Some Muslims see Islam as peaceful, while fundamentalists and radicals peach intolerance toward any other religion. We can view these radicals and fundamentalists as bullies as the governments of non Islamic countries often do, including the USA, but this is wishful thinking. The fact is that many of the moderate Muslims condone and support privately the Islamic policy of non tolerance for any religion other than Islam. Still other Muslims, may privately believe in tolerance, but prefer to sit on their hands, rather than stand up, speak out and be counted. The real minority is those who do speak up. 


       Freedom of speech and intolerance are never going to be able to coexist. The children of democracy are born and breed with the song " sticks and stones will break my bones, but names will never hurt me". Yet look at Islam today attacking the embassies and consulates throughout the Islamic world, people dead because of a film. People died a few years ago because of a few cartoons by a danish author. Islam has no tolerance, it never has. The holy book of Islam, The Qu'ran has scores of passages that confirm this. Any objective scholar will tell you that Islam speaks of converting non Islam's or purging them from the holy lands. Purging means any means possible, including killing them. Sharia law is the fundamentalist Islamic law that tramples women and children's rights and educations. Some can say this is an extreme, but it is what the Qu'ran preaches. Often moderate Muslims do not see, that they too are in danger, because the Qu'ran preaches Muslims who are not devout enough, are targeted for expunging, right after the non Muslims !



        I've been watching the Western "free" press, tiptoe this tightrope of tolerance. I've been watching the democratic governments embrace the fallacy that Islam is not their enemy, and is a religion of peace. Hogwash !  Islam is the biggest threat to the world, just as Israel says. We've made excuses for Islam, long enough, the time to awake to the facts, is rapidly approaching. In today's world over ninety percent of terrorism is preformed in the name of Islam, that is fact, not fiction. The tens of thousands protesting around the Islamic world today wish to suppress freedom of speech, this is a fact, not fiction. The Qu'ran seeks to impose Sharia law and this too is fact, not fiction. It is a fact not fiction that Islam continues to enslave and expunge indigenous peoples from all over the world including Africa.  



        We know that Muslim terrorists, fundamentalists, radicals and some part of passive moderate Muslims are enemies of democracy and freedom of speech. Yet still, I am not anti Muslim, but I am anti Islam. There are peaceful, Muslims, however they are becoming the minority. Islam is a serious threat to democracies and free speech. It is high time democratic governments stop their feeble attempts at sugar coating Islam, Israel has long been the lone voice speaking the truth. We just can't wish Islam to be tolerant, or ignore it because it is not going away, it is being more and more intrusive, and more and more are being killed in its name. Calling a spade, a spade, should not be evil, look at how Islam is trying to bully  democratic  governments !  Cartoons and film? Is Mohammad or Allah that weak that sticks and stones and names hurt them? Why should Islam be given a free pass from criticism and humor? 


How did we get to this point? Well simply look at who is throwing rocks at the protests, it is the youth, and their education. Yep, it is those nasty madrassas with the rocking back and forth chanting students, and the fundamentalist teachers. If Islam is to be saved it needs to start at these madrassas. Until it does change there, we have fifteen plus years of violence and intolerance to deal with. To be fair, we also got to this point by our democratic governments tolerating the cancer that is Islam, and not seeing it for the evil it really is. I'm truly sorry that people are getting killed, yet that is hardly a filmmakers guilt, it is the democratic governments who continue to be in denial about the objectives of Islam.  

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


 

Mexico : September 16th Grito De Dolores O El Grito De La Independencia


Nogeles

Mexico, oh my, where to start? So many extremes laced in a siesta ! Where violence and tranquility are strange bedfellows. Religion and sin dance together to the Mariachi. Mexico and Brazil are the only two Latin American countries who declared war on the Axis powers in WWll, None did in WWl. The vast number of military engagements are historically internal or defensive in Mexico, and of these there are many. Banditos are a recurring theme and to a large part, an inbred culture in Mexico, think of Poncho Villa. The "cry of Delores" or "cry of Independence" was uttered on September 16, 1810. Typical of Mexico, this is when the war of Independence started, not when it was finished. In a way, this is a perfect example of just how different Mexican (and to some extent Latino) mentalities are. What outsiders expect, may be what they see, but what they see, is what is intended for them to see. 




    Mexico leads the world in labor statistics and is near the bottom of the list in wages. When France who eventually ruled Mexico for a short time, lost their first engagement, (before eventually ruling Mexico), the date was the fifth of May, 1862. What most of the world celebrates as Cinco de Mayo, Mexicans, do not celebrate this day (except for the sake of tourists, who naturally they are happy to please). What happened between 1810 and 1962 you might ask? Well in a nutshell, Mexico had several internal conflicts largely over the spoils of victory. The USA flexed its muscle and its manifest destiny mentality as well as voracious appetite for land. Mexico borrowed heavily from European powers, particularly France, and France came to collect. 


Guaymas, my getaway 

Before 1810, the Spanish had conquered Mexico. Herman Cortes had most of the Aztec blood on his hands, the Aztecs conquered the Mayans, who survived the advanced civilizations collectively of Olmec, Toltec, Teotihuacan, and Zapotec. Indeed some pretty heady, high brow cultures, to be sure. Therefore, despite the weakness of Mexico's educational system, Mexicans are quite intelligent, they're usually just not book smart. Street smart is the term I'd use, all Mexicans are street smart. Mexico has a very small middle class, a huge lower class, and a minuscule upper class, that has buckets. When you meet a rich Mexican, they are very, very rich, and often it is old family money. Of course the rich are educated in the United States, not in Mexico. 


Mexico City

To be frightfully honest, I have lived here on and off for ten years, I have always paid my way, given advice and help freely, but I never will be accepted by the lower and middle classes, no matter what I do. Even those who know me, my neighbors, smile and say " Buenos Dia", but whisper "pinche Americano". This is quite different from my beloved Cuba, where I have made real and lasting friendships. Heck, I can't think of a single Cuban who has not paid me back when I loaned them some much needed cash, nor can I name one vicino (neighbor) or conocido (acquaintance) here in Mexico that has paid me back. Silly difference? Maybe, but something to consider when thinking of France. On the other hand, a poor Mexican will freely offer another one of his last two cigarettes, 10 pesos of his last 20 peso note, not to a gringo, but among themselves. Maybe the saving mentality is just absent, and they live one day at a time.   


Cabo San Lucas

Mexico, has really majestic geography, awesome mountains, beaches, and weather you can't beat anywhere. The food is fresh and tasty, seafood is abundant. Living on the border as I do, is the best of both worlds, I can shop at Walmart,Home Depot, or golf or swim in the USA, and enjoy the low price of labor in Mexico. Of course there is not much culture on the border, we find that in the major cities around the country, not a border town. Still. there was a parade today, plenty of street vendors selling their wares and foods, music piping all night long and fireworks to look forward to. Thus, as one day at a time's go, it is a good day !  Feliz dia de la  Independencia ! 


Cancun

Labels: , , ,


 

China's Insatiable Appetite For Land


     

     China is hungry AGAIN. Don't make the mistake to assume its just the Senkaku Islands dispute with Japan. In May China reasserted its claim on the entire Philippines !  Taiwan is all but gone following the strategy of a boa constrictor that we saw be successful in gobbling Hong Kong, Macao and Nepal. China claims not just the Senkaku Islands, but Okinawa and in fact all of Japan and her territories as well !  Really it is challenging to find any existing border of China where she cedes a territory or sovereign nation on the other side of it . In some cases China's claims actually run right through a country to and through the neighbor to said neighbor's neighbor. 


       It is relevant to understand China's culture, history, education and strategies. In a nutshell this is where the Western mentality and culture fails to recognize the complex nature and patience of the Eastern mentality. The West would not be paranoid to assume that the strategy is layered with more intrigue, twists and turns than an intricate spy novel. China you will learn has her own set of rules and while it may seem like she is playing by Western accepted UN rules, in actuality she is not, and never will be. One small example would be the protests we are seeing being reported from China. Suddenly after the news black outs four years ago during the Beijing Olympics (or anything else anti China), we see the Chinese government orchestrate demonstrations.We also see China providing free infrastructure all over Africa, seems a bit out of character doesn't it ? China never has been a benevolent giver, unless there is an objective, so forewarned is forearmed.

 
     Throughout history China has never been a democracy, the wishes of the population of any given region or country they take over are minimized. The strategy here, as we have seen historically is that China is willing to wait, they have unlimited patience, you might ask why wait? Because it is the path of least resistance, and through educational controls China always introduces, the newly educated generation is more receptive to China. Yep, basically it is indoctrination, for when you control education, and the media, you influence and control the population. Nepal, Tibet are firmly in China's tentacles and if you don't think China is licking its chops at most of Northern India along its expanded borders I have a bridge to sell you in  Brooklyn. I do not see China returning the Shaksgam Valley anytime soon either. Obviously with the many territories of India (China claims), natural resources in the Himalayas  are really what they are after. The sources of the rivers, the minerals are the prize, not the peoples, just as it is fishing and natural gas in the Senkaku Islands. This is a fundamental difference between India and the West verses the East( China), people in the East(China) are an expendable instrument, in the West and India they are cherished. 


       China is using her newly acquired economic muscle to silence the usual champions of human rights, because the greedy bastards are still playing the game for their own gluttonous generation. When they begin to learn that China makes her own rules and moves laboriously in her own time, then she might begin to be accountable by Western rules, but not before. Other regions in the insatiable beast's sights are,(India): Jammu and Kashmir; Arunachal Pradesh; Demchok, Chumar, Kaurik, Shipki Pass, Jadh, and Lapthal; Kalapani region, the smaller Susta River dispute and the smaller still Antudanda and Nawalparasi disputes;Shaksgam Valley;Trans-Karakoram Tract Other area include: Tumen River (Korea); Spratly Islands; Scarborough Shoal (Philippines); Paracel Islands (Vietnam); Okinotorishima (Japan);  Macclesfield Bank (Vietnam); Kula Kangri and mountainous areas to the west of this peak, plus the western Haa District of Bhutan; Leodo Island/Suyan Rock (aka Socotra Rock, Korea); Bhutanese enclaves in Tibet, namely Cherkip Gompa, Dho, Dungmar, Gesur, Gezon, Itse Gompa, Khochar, Nyanri, Ringung, Sanmar, Tarchen and Zuthulphuk (Bhutan); Eastern part of Bhutan; Mainland China, Hainan, and other islands controlled by the PRC; Heixiazi / Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island (Russia); Kachin State (Myanmar); 106.40 square kilometers in Kazakhstan; Kutuzov Island (Russia); Outer Mongolia ( Mongolia) ; Part of the Rasŏn administrative division (North Korea); Sixty-Four Villages East of the Heilongjiang River (Russia);
Taiwan,Penghu.Jinmen,Matsu Islands, Pratas Islands (Taiwan); Tuva (Russia); Songling District and Jiagedaqi District (Inner Mongloia). Having listed these KNOWN claims, remember these are Western rules and logically when applying "China rules" this could be and most likely is much larger and ambitious.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


 

What Are The Least Violent Religions To Mankind ?


     
       There are a number of ways to qualify this, but how we are going to approach this today is in groups. We are going to look at these historically, verses today, or a certain time frame. For example, Catholicism would certainly be more violent during The Spanish Inquisition, than it is now. Therefore, lets start with the Abrahamic religions and their major components. These are the religions who believe they descend from Abraham, and each believes in one God or is monotheistic, We will rank these from oldest to newest, beginning with Judaism. Now within Judaism there are many branches such as Samaritan , but perhaps unfairly and due to space we will simply use Judaism collectively. Christianity follows with the birth of Christ and led to The Catholic faith that began splintering into branches in 381AD, and while there are others, the three main branches are: Rome (includes the West and 22 Eastern Catholic churches);Eastern Christianity are Christian traditions and churches that developed in the Balkans, Eastern Europe, Asia Minor, the Middle East, Horn of Africa, India and parts of the Far East ; Islam began roughly in 610 - 620AD, and its two major branches of Sunni and Sh'iah, ( there are others, and Sufism would get my nod, of the least violent of these)  Protestantism, and its many fragments arrived next in the 16th century with Martin Luther and The Reformation (for my Republican friends, I should add that this is where The Later Day Saints Church and its principle Mormon branch fits); The Bahá'í Faith was started in Persia around 1844. 



      It is not too difficult to tab the less violent branches in Abrahamic religions. Generally speaking the Abrahamic religions are by far historically the most violent of all religions. Yet even in the midst of all this violent history (that we don't need to revisit), there are some notable exceptions. It is not just its shorter history that awards the prize to The Bahá'í Faith, but for its tenets and beliefs.Thus, if you are looking for a peaceful branch of an Abrahamic religion other than, Islam, Christianity or Judaism, I suggest you Google The Bahá'í Faith. Now before my Christian, Muslim and Jewish friends cry foul, permit me to make two statements: 1) Any religion does good, some more than others and most are more self serving in the process. While we can argue about religious educations and their value (or lack of in colonizing), we readily salute them for the health services they provide, as well as agricultural contributions. 2) It is important historically and currently to understand how religion and government use and excuse themselves. Certainly Hitler expunging the Jews in his empire was a religious crime of serious magnitude, yet he did it under the auspicious of Germany and The Third Reich. The same is true of The Iran - Iraq war that pitted Sunni against Shi'ah, or the atrocities committed by Roman Catholics during The Spanish Inquisition. The list of examples is long, and the point is that religion and government make strange, but convenient  bedfellows. Ask almost any Muslim and they will point to the USA and the Christian policies that "In God We Trust" that tout freedom intrusively. Remember The Crusades? There is a significant amount of history between these two religions, and then there is Israel and Palestine ! Christianity and Islam are not only under the Abrahamic banner, they are the two largest religions in the world today. 



      Now we come looking to the group of religions we call India founded. I'm not wild about this name, as noble India has had many borders and even using the treasured "subcontinent" can be misleading. However, we will go with it and start with the mother Hinduism, followed by Jainism, the various forms of Buddhism, and finally Sikhism. Like the Abrahamic branch there are many branches within these religions, but as before we'll use these major designations. In most, but not all cases, these are considered  dharmic religions. Based on archaeological proof, Hinduism is considered by many to be the world's oldest religion, Judaism is a challenger as well as the many indigenous religions in other cradles of civilization, yet the physical evidence (at this juncture) favors Hinduism's claim. If we ask Hindu's many would say theirs is indeed a peaceful religion, as most of the violence was Islam attacking them. However, a Muslim would vehemently disagree, as would perhaps a Sikh. Fortunately though we have two candidates here that stand head and shoulders above as far as non violence and peaceful existence with mankind, these are Jainism and Buddhism. Jainism is perhaps less of a controversial choice, than Buddhism. The reason is that there has been violence, and continues to be violence in Buddhism. Here, the observer can say it is defensive, yet violence is violence and we are not here to place blame, but simply identify. You can find out more about Jainism through your favorite search engine. 



   The Persia religions include Zoroastrianism, Kurdish tribal religions and Mandaeism. Again there are others but these are the major domo's. None of these really stand out as being particularly violent or outstandingly peaceful. Other religions of note that I would not classify in our elite group of tolerant, non violent include Shinto, Chinese Folk, Korean, Shinshūkyō, Scientology, Cao Đài, and Taoism. African Traditional Religions are a mixed bag, though the Yoruba branch is my religion, as much as I'd like to include it to our elite group, I can't. Not because of the animal sacrifices, (because we are talking about mankind), but because of its warrior roots and infighting with other tribes historically. The same is true of ancient mezzo American religions like the Aztecs, Mayans etc. Even the Native Americans don't get the nod, not because of the persecution they suffered at the hands of the white man, but because of their infighting among other tribes. The same is true of most indigenous cultures, though there are exceptions. 



    Shall we award a grand prize? I think not, but each of the category winners are well worth reading up on, and have earned my respect. Having said that, even in the most violent religions there are those who find the peaceful and tolerant path of peaceful coexistence with other religions and ways of life. I find that the more focused religions are on respecting Nature, the more peaceful they generally are. After all, humanity is a part of Nature, though many religions and followers seem to forget it. We don't want to get into a discussion on the value of humanity to Nature, though do we? To some, including me, not killing fleas or bedbugs seems extreme, however littering or polluting a river does not. Neither does civilization encroaching on a rain forest, or the erosion of the ozone layer by greenhouse gases. Seriously, if we look at the religions who celebrate Nature through ceremony and beliefs, we will find the peaceful ones.  

     

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


 

Why Did Mitt Romney Quit Golf ?



1960 article touting Mr. Romney having golf as a sport he enjoys. 

     You might consider this an odd reason not to vote for Mitt, but just bear with me for a bit. Now Mr, Romney grew up in the privileged country clubs of Michigan, and we know that we are all products of our environments. " You can take the boy out of the country, but you can't take the country out of the boy". Why did he quit? Certainly all of his rich friends played golf and according the displayed article he once did too. To me a golfer, it is more than odd he quit. Golf is linked to business, and business to golf, especially at the board level that Mr, Romney frequented later in life. Of course I have other reasons why Mr. Romney does not get my vote, but this one has been molesting me. 


President Obama signaling the crowd to observe etiquette
while his opponent is putting.


      Golf is a unique game on a number of fronts, it is game where the player has a responsibility to keep their own score, and sign for that score at the end of each round. The golfer has a responsibility to record their score so that their handicap is correct and current. It is major sport's only game (I know of) where the player is charged with the responsibility of calling a penalty on themselves, It is almost always an individual sport, rather than a team sport. It is called The Gentleman's game, it is one of the few (if not the only game) based on the honor system. It is a celebration with Nature, a walk in a garden, golfer's are expected to leave the course in an improved condition of how they found it (make improvements during their round). It is a family game, not just for the sport, but for the values it teaches and the character it builds. 

       
Presidents HW Bush, Ford, and Clinton on the tee.

      There are many ways to cheat in golf, yet the cheat is only cheating himself and his reputation, because eventually even the greatest cheat gets caught in golf. It is a game where the rules are clear, not ambiguous, and the same for all. There are many examples of the cheater getting caught throughout the game's long and storied history. There are also many examples of honor, integrity, and the rewards for such correct deportment. Many a potential executive has lost a promotion on the golf course due to arrogance or stupidity. Many a business and personal relationship, has soured on the links. The wise know golf is about character, respect and honesty and they use the game as a testing ground to study the character of a man or woman. 


JFK on the course

      I am not making an accusation of Mr. Romney here, I am simply making an educated observation.I can honestly say that I don't know anyone who plays golf, who quit without a very definite reason or circumstance. The fact that Mr. Romney keeps picking on President Obama's enjoying the game leads me to assume there is more to this contradiction than meets the eye. If I were the DNC, I'd be interviewing those who witnessed Mr. Romney play golf, and dig for the reason he quit. Quitting is not an admirable trait for a President, particularly when it is a noble game like golf. 


IKE has a tree named for him at Augusta, where The Masters is played.

Recent US Presidents who played golf as president: Dwight D Eisenhower (1953-1961), John F Kennedy (1961-1963), Lyndon B Johnson (1963-1969), Richard M Nixon (1969-1974), Gerald Ford (1974-1977), Jimmy Carter (1977-1981),Ronald Reagan (1981-1989), George H.W.Bush (1989-1993), Bill Clinton (1993-2001), George W Bush (2001-2009), Barack Obama (2009-     ). Yep, every single President. Therefore as a student of politics, with a father who ran for President, is is not more than a little odd, that Mr. Romney would ignore history while taking digs at THE President, for playing golf ? I smell a story. 


Ronald Reagan's high finish. 

Labels: , , , , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?